Parental Perspectives on Immunizations: Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Childhood Vaccine Hesitancy.

Childhood vaccine hesitancy has been studied extensively before the COVID-19 pandemic. The pandemic presented new barriers to pediatric vaccinations. Furthermore, the development of COVID-19 vaccines has complicated factors underlying vaccine hesitancy. We performed a cross-sectional mobile phone-based survey at Children's Hospital Los Angeles querying parents regarding perspectives on vaccines before and during the pandemic. Our primary aim was to understand the impact of the pandemic on routine childhood vaccine hesitancy. Secondarily, we examined intent to vaccinate, COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy, and key contributing demographic factors. Among 252 participants, we found overall increased childhood vaccine hesitancy (p = 0.006), increased risk perception (p = 0.006), and unchanged vaccine confidence during the COVID-19 pandemic. Increased hesitancy did not translate into decreased intent to vaccinate with routine childhood vaccines or influenza vaccines. During the pandemic, households with higher income (50-99 K, > 100 K) correlated with decreased routine childhood vaccine hesitancy, while Hispanic ethnicity and African American race had increased risk perception. For COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy, households with higher income (> 100 K) correlated with decreased hesitancy, while non-White ethnicity and race had increased risk perception. We found that routine childhood vaccine hesitancy increased during the COVID-19 pandemic, mainly due to increased risk perception. Key contributing demographic factors behind both childhood vaccine hesitancy and COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy included household income and race. Understanding factors behind routine childhood vaccine hesitancy is crucial to maintaining pediatric vaccination rates and promoting vaccine confidence during and after the COVID-19 pandemic.

Improving ABCDEF Bundle Compliance and Clinical Outcomes in the ICU: Randomized Control Trial to Assess the Impact of Performance Measurement, Feedback, and Data Literacy Training

OBJECTIVES: Describe the effects of data literacy training and continuous performance reports on ICU staff compliance with the 6-element ICU quality bundle approach known as the ABCDEF (A–F) bundle and patient outcomes. DESIGN: Stepped-wedge cluster randomized trial conducted during an institutional A–F bundle implementation program. SETTING: Single-center study conducted in eight adult ICUs. PATIENTS: Adult patients admitted for at least 24 hours, not undergoing active withdrawal of life support or palliative care. INTERVENTIONS: Four ICUs in the intervention group received bundle-related staff education, data literacy training, and weekly bundle performance reports during the 12-month study period. The four ICUs in the nonintervention group received none of these interventions. Bundle compliance and patient outcomes were tracked, including ICU and hospital mortality, transfer and discharge, discharge disposition, mechanical ventilation, and ICU delirium. MEASUREMENT AND RESULTS: In the intervention group, staff education alone increased bundle compliance from 9% to 16% (p < 0.0001);data literacy training further increased compliance from 16% to 21% (p = 0.03). This improvement was sustained throughout the study period including the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic and was greater than improvement in the nonintervention group (p < 0.001). Full A–F bundle compliance was associated with a lower likelihood of next-day ICU and hospital mortality, discharge to a facility other than home, and was associated with a higher likelihood of next-day extubation in patients. Next-day ICU and hospital discharge likelihood decreased, and delirium frequency was not affected. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study demonstrating that the combination of staff education, data literacy training, and access to performance data improves A–F bundle compliance, sustains performance, and improves ICU patient outcomes (ICU and hospital mortality, mechanical ventilation duration, and home discharge rates). In contrast to previous studies, increased bundle compliance did not hasten ICU or hospital discharges or reduce delirium frequency in patients.

Telemedicine in Otolaryngology During COVID-19: Patient and Physician Satisfaction.

OBJECTIVE: To examine patient and physician satisfaction with telemedicine in otolaryngology during COVID-19 and identify associated factors. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: Tertiary care center. METHODS: Patient satisfaction was rated by patients (age ≥18 years) who had encounters from May to July 2020 (n = 407). Physician satisfaction was rated by 15 otolaryngologists for specific encounters delivered from May to June 2020 (n = 1011). Patient satisfaction was measured with a Press Ganey questionnaire and a Telemedicine Satisfaction Questionnaire. Mean Press Ganey satisfaction scores of telemedicine encounters during COVID-19 were compared with the pre-COVID-19 Press Ganey scores from in-person encounters (n = 3059) to test a noninferiority hypothesis. Physician satisfaction was measured with a Provider Satisfaction Questionnaire. RESULTS: The mean Press Ganey patient satisfaction score for telemedicine encounters was 94.5 (SD, 8.8), no worse than that for in-person encounters prior to COVID-19 at 93.7 (SD, 15.5; Δ = 0.8 [95% CI, -0.5 to 2.1, excluding the noninferiority margin of -1]). Encounters with videoconference (vs telephone) and patients reporting higher income were associated with higher Telemedicine Satisfaction Questionnaire scores. Physician satisfaction scores during COVID-19 with telemedicine encounters were overall high at 83.3 (95% CI, 77.5-89.1), slightly lower when compared with the scores with in-person encounters at 88.4 (95% CI, 82.5-94.3; Δ = -5.2 [95% CI, -6.6 to -3.8]). Encounters with videoconference (vs telephone) and patients with English as a preferred language and follow-up visits were associated with higher Provider Satisfaction Questionnaire scores. CONCLUSIONS: Telemedicine is a feasible alternative format in otolaryngology during COVID-19 with overall high patient and physician satisfaction. Patient satisfaction with telemedicine encounters during COVID-19 was no worse than in-person encounters prior to the pandemic. Physician satisfaction with telemedicine was relatively lower in comparison with in-person encounters.